Performing percutaneous coronary intervention in the absence of a clear indication is costly and exposes patients to procedural risks, radiation, contrast exposure, and possible stent-related complications. Patients whose symptoms are controlled on optimal medical therapy, and who do not have any high-risk findings* on non-invasive testing (e.g., exercise treadmill test, myocardial perfusion imaging, stress echocardiography, or coronary computed tomographic angiography), should not be referred for percutaneous coronary intervention.
*This table outlines high-risk features of non-invasive test results associated with >3% annual rate of death or MI.
Sources:
Mancini GB, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Aug;30(8):837–849. PMID: 25064578.
Boden WE, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16. PMID: 17387127.
Al-Lamee R et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):31–40. PMID: 29103656.